Agreement | Document symbol | Notifying Member | Year | Harmonized types of environment-related objectives | Harmonized types of measures | Harmonized types of sectors subject to the measure | Measure description | See more information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trade Facilitation | G/TFA/N/AUS/1/REV.3 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management, Climate change mitigation and adaptation, MEAs implementation and compliance, Ozone layer protection
|
Ban/Prohibition, Export licences, Import licences…
Ban/Prohibition, Export licences, Import licences, Regulation affecting movement or transit, Export tariffs, Import tariffs, Internal taxes
|
Chemicals, Manufacturing | Requirements for import, export and transit of…
Requirements for import, export and transit of ozone depleting substances and synthetic greenhouses
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures | G/SPS/N/AUS/532 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management
|
Technical regulation or specifications | Agriculture, Chemicals | Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised…
Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (8 February 2022).
This Proposal seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to align the following maximum residue limits (MRLs) for various agricultural and veterinary chemicals so that they are consistent with other national regulations relating to the safe and effective use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals:(...) The scientific methodology used by Australia to establish MRLs is consistent with international best practice. Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice (GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region. Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards. (...) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures | G/SPS/N/AUS/533 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management
|
Technical regulation or specifications | Agriculture, Chemicals | Call for submissions Proposal M1020 – Maximum…
Call for submissions Proposal M1020 – Maximum Residue Limits (2021).
This Proposal seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to align maximum residue limits (MRLs) with the: Australian Pesticide and Veterinary Medicines Authority MRL Standard; Codex Alimentarius Commission; and trading partner standards relating to residues of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food. (...) The scientific methodology used by Australia to establish MRLs is consistent with international best practice. Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice (GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region. Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures | G/SPS/N/AUS/535 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management
|
Technical regulation or specifications | Agriculture, Chemicals | Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised…
Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (5 April 2022).
This Proposal seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to align the following maximum residue limits (MRLs) for various agricultural and veterinary chemicals so that they are consistent with other national regulations relating to the safe and effective use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals: (...) Certain proposed limits may differ from Codex limits. The scientific methodology used by Australia to establish MRLs is consistent with international best practice. Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice (GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region. Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards. (...) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures | G/SPS/N/AUS/536 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management
|
Technical regulation or specifications | Agriculture, Chemicals | Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised…
Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (17 May 2022). This Proposal seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to align the following maximum residue limits (MRLs) for various agricultural and veterinary chemicals so that they are consistent with other national regulations relating to the safe and effective use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals:(...)
Certain proposed limits may differ from Codex limits. The scientific methodology used by Australia to establish MRLs is consistent with international best practice. Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice (GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region. Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards (...) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures | G/SPS/N/AUS/542 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management
|
Technical regulation or specifications | Agriculture, Chemicals | Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised…
Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (12 July 2022).
This Proposal seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to align the following maximum residue limits (MRLs) for various agricultural and veterinary chemicals so that they are consistent with other national regulations relating to the safe and effective use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals: (...) Certain proposed limits may differ from Codex limits. The scientific methodology used by Australia to establish MRLs is consistent with international best practice. Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice (GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region. Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards. (...) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures | G/SPS/N/AUS/543 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management
|
Technical regulation or specifications | Agriculture, Chemicals | Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised…
Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (23 August 2022).
This Proposal seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to align the following maximum residue limits (MRLs) for various agricultural and veterinary chemicals so that they are consistent with other national regulations relating to the safe and effective use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals:(...) Certain proposed limits may differ from Codex limits. The scientific methodology used by Australia to establish MRLs is consistent with international best practice. Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice (GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region. Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards. (...) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures | G/SPS/N/AUS/555 | Australia | 2022 | Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances…
Chemical, toxic and hazardous substances management
|
Technical regulation or specifications | Agriculture, Chemicals | Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised…
Proposal to amend Schedule 20 of the revised Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (15 November 2022).
This Proposal seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code to align the following maximum residue limits (MRLs) for various agricultural and veterinary chemicals so that they are consistent with other national regulations relating to the safe and effective use of agricultural and veterinary chemicals:(...) Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice (GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region. Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards. (...) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agriculture | G/AG/N/USA/167 | United States of America | 2022 | Water management and conservation | Grants and direct payments, Non-monetary support | Agriculture | Technical and financial assistance under…
Technical and financial assistance under paragraph 3(III) of the Decision:
f. Value of food assistance used in development programs (Total: USD 821,603,822). This figure represents the U.S. dollar value of the commodities donated under Title II, Food for Progress and Food for Education food aid programs (...) Typically, the proceeds are used for water management/irrigation programs, farm credit, agricultural infrastructure, (...). |
|